One of the benefits of sleeping alone this week as John worked in Ottawa was bringing my laptop into bed, and firing up Netflix without any protest. I settled on All About Eve a 1950 film with Bette Davis.
I loved this smart retro chick-flick. My favourite character was Karen, the Radcliffe educated wife of America’s most famous playwright. Karen suspects a young promising actress, Eve, is maneuvering to win her husband Lloyd’s heart. Ironic, given that it was Karen who had taken the young Eve under her wing, and opened big doors for her—even helping her land the lead role in her eminent husband’s play.
As Karen lies awake one night, staring at the ceiling, she sighs heavily:
It’s seemed to me I had known always it would happen and here it was. I felt helpless. That helpless you feel when you have no talent to offer outside of loving your husband. How could I compete? Everything Lloyd loved about me he had gotten used to long ago.
The last sentence zapped me like a lightening bolt.
After decades of being a couple, what “new” is there left to discover, to fall in love with all over again? Those heady days of mystery have faded into black, and we become known commodities, as familiar to our partners as the back of their hands. My husband recently handed me a copy of the New Yorker, “Here, you’ll get a kick out of this cartoon,” he said. The cartoon was of a middle-aged couple sitting a safe distance from each other in their living room, staring blankly. The caption read, “100% Recycled Conversation”.
How can the fictitious Karen, and the very real “us” compete with someone like Eve, who offers our partner something fresh, something that they have not “gotten used to long ago”? Should we even bother to try?
I’m not one for competition. I don’t have a killer instinct And, I don’t want to win at all costs. But mostly, I don’t like to compare myself to other women, and viewing them as my adversaries. Karen asks herself, “How could I compete?” Is this the right question? After all, she’s well educated, kind, loving, unwaveringly devoted. Isn’t this enough?
Why is “new” often considered better than “old”? What’s wrong with “recycled conversation”—making each other laugh with inside jokes that were co-scripted long ago; finding comfort and stability in the familiar; continuing to appreciate the qualities that drew us to our partners in the first place?
“Retro” has become the fashion in clothes, music and furniture. Shouldn’t it be fashionable in love too?
Photo credit:Flickr/bswise
Previous: Studying The (Bread) BibleNext: The Making of a Bread Thief
nancie mcleod
Jan 21, 2016 -
Great questions Sue! Not sure there are any great answers!!!!
Sue Nador
Jan 21, 2016 -
I know, I know. I have more questions than answers…but I keep plugging away 🙂
Kathy Caldwell
Jan 21, 2016 -
Such an excellent point! And not one that is voiced often – I don’t see it making the cover of Cosmo amidst all the articles attempting to teach us all “new tricks” in order to keep things interesting. Such a temptation to overlook all that we have together in favour of the “new” and greener grass on the other side of the fence – when “new” doesn’t necessarily equate to “better”.
Sue Nador
Jan 21, 2016 -
Darn it, Kathy. I was hoping to land on the cover of Cosmo. I have pitched to them before, and total silence Now I know why! Thank you so much for your comment. I can think of many examples where one partner has been kidnapped by NRE (new relationship energy) only to experience a major letdown later, having risked something stable and loving.There is a benefit and cost to everything.
eden baylee
Jan 21, 2016 -
Great piece Sue.
I think every couple in a longterm relationship must experience this sooner or later. Falling into a pattern of familiarity is comfortable, not bad …but it does remind me of a Seinfeld scene …
I’m taking liberties on the dialogue but hope you get the drift. I tried to find the Youtube clip but no luck…
Jerry: Where should we go for supper?
George: To the diner. We know the diner. The food is good.
Jerry: Yeah, but we always go the diner. We should try something new.
George: But … if we try something new, what if we don’t like it? We’ll be disappointed and wished we were at the diner.
Oh, if only relationships were as simple as choosing a new restaurant and being able to return to the old one if we didn’t like it!
xo
eden
Sue Nador
Jan 21, 2016 -
Oh, I love this analogy, Eden! It’s such a tightrope walk isn’t it, this relationship thing? We want stability and novelty at the same time, and preferably in one package. It’s no easy task. Thank you for the great comment! xo
valerie fox
Jan 22, 2016 -
your post made me smile. Being married as long as I have, these types of thoughts do seep into my mind. A huge part of the longevity of a relationship is growing. You both will grow over time – I figure you can grow closer, you can grow in parallel and/or you can grow apart.
Sue Nador
Jan 22, 2016 -
Thanks Val. I am glad this made you smile! Perhaps one issue is that some people stop growing, or are not interested in continuing to grow. And if we become less interesting to ourselves, how can we expect to remain interesting to our partners?